Conflict of Orders; Interaction and Relations of Normative Orders in Iran >> Link
This is the abstract of my presentation in the conference on:
"Conflicts, Conflict Resolution and Natural Resources in the Middle East", Tehran, Iran, 06.12.2006. Abstract Dispute is a culturally-determined phenomenon. Different cultural settings manufacture different disputes and correspondingly introduce different procedures and responses for their settlement. A legal system to be effective and efficient has no way but to notice to its cultural and social setting and keep up with it. In However, modern legislations and central bureaucratic adjudication, to be effective, has to guide the individual conducts and recognise their conceived grievances. Regarding to the traditional and popular ways of redressing of grievances in Anyway, both contemporary political regimes in Modernist regime of Pahlavi was ignorant to The main concern of this study is that how much state legal system has been successful in redressing people’s grievances in This paper will focus on some emergent conceptions of grievance like family violence and the judicial reaction to these grievances. It concludes that judiciary power to build and maintain its legitimacy and public trust has to recognize some informal and public perception of grievances or at least open the doors of negotiation and discussion before the emergent social groups. To be participative dose not merely mean to invent new institutions, rather means to accept and admit some other understanding of right and wrong in society. |
No comments:
Post a Comment